Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2000-06-28 (15:44)
From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...>
Subject: Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:12:50PM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote:

> One issue with using CamlP4 which has been brought up before is that there 
> seems to be some emerging consensus on using ">>" and "<<" for function 
> composition, and there is a clash with CamlP4's use of these tokens. Is
> there a good solution to this?

The only solution would be to adopt another syntax for quotations. For that
the only solution is to change the lexer (lib/ in Camlp4, or to
use another lexer, a copy of this lexer with another way to represent
quotations. But which one? which other syntax?