Archives of the Caml mailing list > Message from Daniel de Rauglaudre

Browse thread

How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?

David.Mentre@i...
- Christian Rinderknecht
- Daniel de Rauglaudre
  - Remi VANICAT
    - Pierre Weis
      - Julian Assange
    - Daniel de Rauglaudre
      - Brian Rogoff
        
        Daniel de Rauglaudre

Date:	-- (:)
From:	Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...>
Subject:	Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:12:50PM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote:

> One issue with using CamlP4 which has been brought up before is that there 
> seems to be some emerging consensus on using ">>" and "<<" for function 
> composition, and there is a clash with CamlP4's use of these tokens. Is
> there a good solution to this?

The only solution would be to adopt another syntax for quotations. For that
the only solution is to change the lexer (lib/plexer.ml) in Camlp4, or to
use another lexer, a copy of this lexer with another way to represent
quotations. But which one? which other syntax?

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/