Browse thread
Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Max Skaller <maxs@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml |
Daniel Ortmann wrote: > > Sirs, > > With the intent of furthering the practical commercial use of O'Caml, or at > least eliminating some possible objections to its use ... I submit the > following observations and questions for your consideration: The issues raised so far (where I work and use Ocaml) were: 1) no one here knows it 2) possible licence restrictions Since I use the native code compiler exclusively, there's no current problem involving bytecode. BTW: people here read books. An English Ocaml book would provide very strong support for industrial use. -- John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd] mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au -- at work mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au -- at home