Browse thread
Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?
-
qrczak@k...
-
Daniel de Rauglaudre
-
Julian Assange
- Brian Rogoff
-
Julian Assange
-
Daniel de Rauglaudre
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Rogoff <bpr@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"? |
On 1 Jul 2000, Julian Assange wrote: > The revised syntax is cleaner, but drops so much syntactic sugar, that the > language becomes ugly due to its verbosity. As usual, opinions like this are much more useful and interesting when butressed by concrete examples. What's the sugar you miss, infixes? You can use p4 to get those. Something else? -- Brian