Browse thread
Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"?
-
qrczak@k...
-
Daniel de Rauglaudre
- Julian Assange
-
Daniel de Rauglaudre
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Julian Assange <proff@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"? |
Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr> writes: > Hello, > > > Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:12:50 -0700 (PDT), Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com> pisze: > > > > > I admit I'm also fond of the Revised syntax. > > > > Sorry, I'm new: what is the Revised syntax? Where can I read about it? > > It is a alternative syntax for Ocaml proposed in Camlp4, supposed to > fix some syntax problems in the language. > > http://caml.inria.fr/camlp4/manual/ The revised syntax is cleaner, but drops so much syntactic sugar, that the language becomes ugly due to its verbosity. Cheers, Julian.