Browse thread
automatic construction of mli files
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Anton Moscal <msk@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: automatic construction of mli files |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > Not to say that the current situation is perfect. The fact you have to > duplicate all type definitions is not so nice for instance. But for > people used to the .ml/.mli dichotomy, having both kind of information > united in a single file does not seem very attractive. I think, SML `local' is a good alternative to interfaces in the many cases: `local' allows to hide definitions from the module interface without explicit signature specification. Regards, Anton Moscal