Browse thread
Re: circular types?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Hendrik Tews <tews@t...> |
| Subject: | Re: circular types? |
Hi, John Max Skaller writes: From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:03:29 +1100 Subject: Re: circular types? I think this can be done now. Here is the method: to have a type t and a class c mutually dependent, for example: class type c = object x : t end and type t = C c | Null write class type c' ['t] = object x : 't end type t = C t c' | Null class type c = t c' Yes, this is the theoretical answer. But this just doesn't work out in anything bigger than a tutorial example. I am involved in programming a logic compiler. We have about 40 variant types and at least 10 classes. If my design were not constraint by the abilities of the ocaml compiler some of the classes were in mutual recursion with the bigger halve of the variant types. So you are not telling me seriously I should write classes with 10 type variables! Just for curiosity: Does somebody use the above workaround in a project with more than 10.000 lines of ocaml code? (We do, but every typing error is a nightmare.) Bye, Hendrik