[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: non-symbol infix functions |
>But, no, you can ``do it internally'', if you wanted to write the >corresponding Caml code. Right, I meant for an arbitrary identifier. Anyway, is there a rationale for this? Was it just not worth the effort, or did it lead to ambiguities or something? Chris