Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
non-symbol infix functions
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d...>
Subject: Re: non-symbol infix functions

>But, no, you can ``do it internally'', if you wanted to write the
>corresponding Caml code. 

Right, I meant for an arbitrary identifier.

Anyway, is there a rationale for this?  Was it just not worth the effort, or did it lead to ambiguities or something?

Chris