Browse thread
Re: Redefinition doesn't work
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2000-11-03 (15:13) |
From: | Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@a...> |
Subject: | Good programming languages (Was: Redefinition doesn't work) |
>> So better start by saying ``if you want to obtain this effect, you >> just have to reload the entire program''! >> Pierre Weis Sorry, I don't buy your arguments. The most important aspects of a programming language for me is: 1. typed (to find typo-like bugs, or when changing the program) 2. interactive environment (to be able to test hard part of the program without have to write elaborate function just for testing) 3. easy to use and understand libraries. 4. good syntax, which makes it easy to write the correct code 5. fast 6. portable, works on windows and linux 7. good support or good open source team 8. cheap On a scale from 1 to 5, where 5 is the best, Ocaml would get 5 for typed, 3 for interactive environment (better than C, Java, SML, but much worse than Lisp, Prolog, Scheme, examples of problem: #relet, not very good emacs-modes, no object-browser), 2 for easy to use libraries (it is so hard to find the right function, I have to search thru the PDF-file all the time), 2 for good syntax (it is very easy to spend a lot of time trying to get the program to compile, for example I called a attribute in a record 'value', and that works sometimes I have noticed :-), 5 for fast, 5 for portable (when ocamldebug works on windows) 4 for good support (I tried to understand the source code of ocaml, but my French is to bad.) 5 for cheap Very good scores for ocaml, but there are places for improvements. /mattias