Browse thread
Re: Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods.
- Daniel Ortmann
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2000-12-25 (21:37) |
From: | Daniel Ortmann <ortmann@u...> |
Subject: | Re: Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods. |
As Markus recommended on comp.lang.functional, the following is worthwhile reading: http://perl.plover.com/yak/typing/typing.html While it was addressed to a "perl" audience, it discusses static typing issues in Pascal and ML-like languages (and others). Definately a *must* read. -- Daniel Ortmann, IBM Circuit Technology, Rochester, MN 55901-7829 ortmann@us.ibm.com / internal 8.553.6795 / external 507.253.6795 ortmann@isl.net home 507.288.7732 "The answers are so simple, and we all know where to look, but it's easier just to avoid the question." -- Kansas Semenova Natalya Nickolaevna <semenova@snob.spb.ru>@inria.fr on 12/21/2000 02:39:37 PM Sent by: Pierre.Weis@inria.fr To: caml-list@inria.fr cc: Subject: Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods. Hi, We are going to rewrite a large bundle of Fortran-3 (!!!) sources to some "better" language. Sources are the solution of the system of differential equations in partial derivatives by normal finite differencing methods. Two candidats are voted: Pascal and Ocaml. Is Caml convenient tool for such tasks? -- ---------------- Semyonova Natalya Nickolaevna ----------------