Browse thread
Same label in different types, how do people solve this?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: Functions must be explicitly typed, (was Same label in different types, how do people solve this?) |
> >>>>> "Mattias" == Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se> writes: > > I don't really see the use of infering types for functions. It works for one I would like to note that type inference (i.e. code without annotations) helps a lot when developing programs: the annotation free code is not only easier to write but also easier to maintain since it is kind of ``auto-adaptative'' and resistant to reorganisations and names modifications. As an example, consider a function with an explicit profile: let (type_type_definition : Synt.td -> ...) = function ... If we consider renaming the module Synt into Syntax, and the type td into type_definition to reflect as closely as possible the intended meanings, we would have to edit the definition of the function (and the definition of every function that uses either the module Synt or the type td). By contrast, if we omit manual type annotations, the type checker will silently change the type assigments as necessary. It is extremely convenient when writing systems that are rapidly evolving. Hope this helps, Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://cristal.inria.fr/~weis/