Browse thread
Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods.
-
Semenova Natalya Nickolaevna
- Brian Rogoff
- Michael Hohn
- Vitaly Lugovsky
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Rogoff <bpr@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods. |
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Semenova Natalya Nickolaevna wrote: > Hi, > > We are going to rewrite a large bundle of Fortran-3 (!!!) sources to some > "better" language. Sources are the solution of the system of differential > equations in partial derivatives by normal finite differencing methods. A walk down memory lane for me. What kind of PDEs are you going to be solving? > Two candidats are voted: Pascal and Ocaml. Is Caml convenient tool for such > tasks? Well, you ask here, so I guess I'll give the expected answer: of course Ocaml is the right tool for this! More seriously, which Pascal are you considering? One of the few annoyances I'd have with Ocaml is the lack of overloading of arithmetic ops, and since Pascal doesn't allow it either (true for all Pascal's I know of, including Oberon descendant Component Pascal) you're worse of there than in Ocaml, where you may at least rebind the operators to whatever you like best. If you must use a Pascal-like language you should use Ada instead; GNAT is a magnificent piece of work. Assuming you make the right choice and go with Ocaml, take a look at the new Bigarray library. I don't think the basic Array stuff is what you want for PDE solvers. You come to Ocaml at a good time, since the Bigarray module was recently added and some floating point optimizations were also put in recently. Work on Gtk bindings is progressing so you'll be able to do nice graphics too. Welcome aboard! -- Brian