Browse thread
Same label in different types, how do people solve this?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2000-12-15 (17:56) |
From: | Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@t...> |
Subject: | RE: Functions must be explicitly typed, (was Same label in different types, how do people solve this?) |
>>> >>>>> "Mattias" == Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se> writes: >>> > I don't really see the use of infering types for functions. It works for one I was wrong! It is very nice to have type inference for local and anynomous functions. >> >> I would like to note that type inference (i.e. code without >> annotations) helps a lot when developing programs: the annotation free >> code is not only easier to write but also easier to maintain since it >> is kind of ``auto-adaptative'' and resistant to reorganisations and >> names modifications. If this were important, we shouldn't have different operators for * and *. I had to change a program from integers to float recently, and it isn't fun at all. /mattias