English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
status of some big "important" features?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-01-02 (11:06)
From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...>
Subject: Re: status of some big "important" features?

On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 05:58:45PM -0800, Chris Hecker wrote:

> Ah, I see.  How hard would it be to hook camlp4 (or another "plugin"
> type thing, but it would be good if it was the same structure as
> camlp4) into other stages of the compiler, like after type
> inference?

Camlp4 allows to make syntax extensions. We could imagine something to
make typing extensions and code generating extensions. But I don't
know how to do that, and even if it is possible in a simple way.

Do other caml-list readers have an opinion about that?