Browse thread
Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierpaolo BERNARDI <bernardp@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?) |
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Xavier Leroy wrote: > It is very relevant indeed. We've been contemplating adding some > simple support for wide characters and wide strings, e.g. as two new > library modules, but the stumbling point is whether to use 16-bit or > 32-bit wide characters. While 32 bits is probably the wave of the > future, 16 bits is what we need to interface easily with Java and with > many Microsoft products (e.g. COM dispatch components, Visual Basic, > various Win32 APIs). "Recruits" as Bob wants to call them, will come from the pubic, not here. -- Robert J. Petry, C.L. - March 24, 2000