Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Michael Hicks <mwh@d...>
Subject: Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, John Max Skaller wrote:
> > 	Actually, I think ocamlopt is _more_ portable.
> > There's no mucking around with custom run-times, etc.
> Well, it would be really funny to see OCaml compete against Java in
> the browser market (a rather unrealistic dream, I fear). Wasn't there a
> basic WWW-browser written in OCaml? I am not sure, but I think it also
> supported OCaml-byte code.

MMM, the Ocaml-based web browser, still exists, see  However, last I knew,
the Ocaml bytecode lacks the security guarantees of Java bytecode.  Dynamic
linking will not violate stated interface constraints, but these can be
spoofed, I believe.  


Michael Hicks
Ph.D. Candidate, the University of Pennsylvania            mailto://
*There was a man who entered a local paper's pun contest; He sent in ten
*different puns, in the hope that at least one of the puns would win.  
*Unfortunately, no pun in ten did.