January,
>
Index by dates
-
2001-01-02
(11:06)
Daniel de Rauglaudre
Re: status of some big "important" features?
-
2001-01-02
(11:07)
Jacques Garrigue
Re: labltk bind ~events list questions/bugs?
-
2001-01-02
(11:06)
Chris Hecker
Re: status of some big "important" features?
-
2001-01-02
(17:02)
Didier Remy
Re: A proposal for overloading ...
-
2001-01-02
(17:02)
Pierre Weis
Happy New Year
-
2001-01-02
(17:03)
Christophe Raffalli
Re: A proposal for overloading ...
-
2001-01-02
(17:04)
Markus Mottl
JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-03
(10:46)
William Chesters
Re: status of some big "important" features?
-
2001-01-03
(10:48)
Mattias Waldau
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-03
(10:50)
Markus Mottl
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-03
(10:51)
Charles Martin
New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-03
(10:51)
John Max Skaller
Re: status of some big "important" features?
-
2001-01-03
(13:37)
Mattias Waldau
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-03
(13:36)
Alain Frisch
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-03
(13:37)
Pierre Weis
Re: New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-03
(14:02)
John Max Skaller
Re: labltk bind ~events list questions/bugs?
-
2001-01-03
(14:02)
John Max Skaller
Re: labltk bind ~events list questions/bugs?
-
2001-01-04
(13:04)
Markus Mottl
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:04)
Vladimir Vyskocil
Re: labltk bind ~events list questions/bugs?
-
2001-01-04
(13:05)
STARYNKEVITCH Basile
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:06)
Jerry Jackson
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:07)
Charles Martin
Re: New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-04
(13:09)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:15)
Brian Rogoff
Re: New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-04
(13:20)
Joseph R. Kiniry
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:24)
Markus Mottl
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:24)
Markus Mottl
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:26)
Joseph R. Kiniry
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:26)
Markus Mottl
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:28)
Joseph R. Kiniry
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:32)
Fabrice Le Fessant
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:33)
Alain Frisch
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(13:39)
Dave Berry
RE: New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-04
(20:19)
Jonathan Coupe
lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-04
(20:19)
Alan Schmitt
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(20:19)
Alain Frisch
Optional fields in modules
-
2001-01-04
(21:01)
Charles Martin
printf - partial application bug
-
2001-01-04
(21:18)
David Gurr
IBMs UVM? RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-04
(21:22)
Pierre Weis
Re: printf - partial application bug
-
2001-01-06
(21:00)
qrczak@k...
Re: New Year's resolution suggestions...
-
2001-01-06
(21:02)
Jonathan Coupe
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(21:05)
Chris Hecker
Re: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-06
(22:17)
Stephane Legrand
A good benchmark for Objective Caml
-
2001-01-06
(22:17)
Jonathan Coupe
Re: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-06
(22:18)
Michael Hicks
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(22:19)
Jacques Garrigue
Re: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-06
(22:19)
Vitaly Lugovsky
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(22:20)
Sven LUTHER
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(22:20)
Sven LUTHER
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(22:20)
Sven LUTHER
Re: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-06
(22:21)
Dmitry Lomov
Dynamic Caml v.0.1 download problems
-
2001-01-06
(22:21)
Joseph R. Kiniry
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-06
(22:23)
Charles Martin
Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-07
(20:11)
Chris Hecker
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-07
(20:16)
Alain Frisch
first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-07
(20:17)
Doug Bagley
Re: A good benchmark for Objective Caml
-
2001-01-07
(20:17)
Chet Murthy
32-bit integer operations
-
2001-01-07
(20:18)
Mattias Waldau
RE: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-07
(20:20)
Mattias Waldau
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-07
(20:22)
Michael Hicks
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-07
(20:23)
Vitaly Lugovsky
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-07
(21:30)
Gerd Stolpmann
Re: 32-bit integer operations
-
2001-01-07
(21:30)
Daniel de Rauglaudre
Re: A good benchmark for Objective Caml
-
2001-01-07
(21:29)
Brian Rogoff
RE: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-08
(11:20)
Markus Mottl
Re: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(11:23)
Xavier Leroy
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-08
(11:27)
Xavier Leroy
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-08
(11:29)
Xavier Leroy
Re: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(11:31)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(17:42)
Alain Frisch
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(17:41)
Sylvain Kerjean
statut du Portage Ocaml <-> BeOS
-
2001-01-08
(17:49)
Judicael Courant
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-08
(17:56)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(17:58)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-08
(17:59)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-09
(08:58)
Dale Arntson
Re: lablgtk for Win32
-
2001-01-09
(09:01)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-09
(09:02)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-09
(09:04)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-09
(09:04)
John Max Skaller
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-10
(08:23)
Dave Berry
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-10
(08:21)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-10
(08:25)
Dave Berry
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-10
(08:27)
Dave Berry
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-10
(08:27)
Daniel Ortmann
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-10
(08:31)
Dave Berry
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-10
(08:33)
Brian Rogoff
Re: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-10
(18:48)
Mattias Waldau
XML, HTTP, SOAP (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-10
(18:49)
Markus Mottl
Re: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-10
(18:51)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class modules (was: alternative module systems)
-
2001-01-10
(18:53)
Mattias Waldau
Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-10
(18:57)
Norman Ramsey
questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-11
(09:23)
Brian Rogoff
Re: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(09:23)
Alain Frisch
Re: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(09:24)
Gerd Stolpmann
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-11
(09:25)
Alain Frisch
first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class modules)
-
2001-01-11
(09:28)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-11
(09:31)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-11
(09:33)
Sylvain BOULM'E
Re: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(09:32)
Mattias Waldau
RE: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(09:33)
Sven LUTHER
Cost of polymorphic variants over normal ones.
-
2001-01-11
(17:29)
Alain Frisch
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-11
(17:30)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class modules)
-
2001-01-11
(17:30)
Alain Frisch
Re: Cost of polymorphic variants over normal ones.
-
2001-01-11
(17:32)
Sven LUTHER
Re: Cost of polymorphic variants over normal ones.
-
2001-01-11
(17:33)
Michel Schinz
Re: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(17:37)
Dave Berry
RE: XML, HTTP, SOAP (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-11
(17:37)
Dave Berry
RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-11
(17:38)
Dave Berry
RE: Module hierarchies
-
2001-01-11
(17:38)
Dave Berry
Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-11
(17:39)
Sylvain BOULM'E
Re: Why can't I use val mover : < move : int -> unit; .. > list -> unit ?
-
2001-01-11
(17:42)
Jacques Garrigue
Re: Cost of polymorphic variants over normal ones.
-
2001-01-12
(08:51)
Dave Berry
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class m odules)
-
2001-01-12
(09:00)
Xavier Leroy
Re: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-12
(09:02)
Xavier Leroy
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-12
(09:02)
Markus Mottl
linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-12
(09:03)
Markus Mottl
Re: Cost of polymorphic variants over normal ones.
-
2001-01-12
(09:06)
Brian Rogoff
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class m odules)
-
2001-01-12
(09:08)
Christophe Raffalli
restart any OCaml program from scratch:
-
2001-01-12
(09:09)
Norman Ramsey
Re: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-12
(09:11)
Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-12
(09:14)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-12
(09:17)
John Max Skaller
Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
-
2001-01-12
(09:19)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-12
(18:57)
Xavier Urbain
Re: linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-12
(18:57)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-12
(19:01)
Markus Mottl
Re: linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-12
(19:02)
Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-12
(19:03)
Dave Berry
RE: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-14
(20:20)
Charles Martin
live variables
-
2001-01-14
(20:18)
Claudio Russo
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class m odules)
-
2001-01-14
(20:17)
Brian Rogoff
Re: linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-14
(20:21)
Markus Mottl
Re: linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-14
(20:23)
Brent Fulgham
RE: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-14
(20:31)
Vitaly Lugovsky
GC question
-
2001-01-14
(20:32)
Nickolay Semyonov
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-14
(20:35)
Nickolay Semyonov
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-14
(20:35)
Nickolay Semyonov
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-14
(20:38)
Alex Baretta
A manual...
-
2001-01-14
(20:38)
Xavier Leroy
Re: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-14
(20:39)
David McClain
Re: linear algebra libraries?
-
2001-01-14
(20:53)
Johann Spies
exec?
-
2001-01-14
(20:53)
Brian Rogoff
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class m odules)
-
2001-01-15
(09:56)
John Prevost
Re: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-16
(10:36)
Dave Berry
RE: first class, recursive, mixin modules (was: RE: first class m odules)
-
2001-01-16
(10:42)
Xavier Leroy
Re: live variables
-
2001-01-16
(10:42)
Jean-Francois Monin
rappel: numero TSI special code mobile
-
2001-01-20
(15:05)
David Mentre
Re: A manual...
-
2001-01-20
(15:06)
Johann Spies
Re: exec? - solved
-
2001-01-20
(15:09)
David Mentre
[off-topic] Survey or book on programming language structures
-
2001-01-20
(15:09)
Franck Delaplace
Set Extension
-
2001-01-20
(15:11)
Alex Baretta
R: A manual...
-
2001-01-20
(15:12)
Alex Baretta
R: A manual...
-
2001-01-20
(15:18)
Dave Berry
RE: questions about costs of nativeint vs int
-
2001-01-20
(15:25)
Olivier Andrieu
libplot for OCaml
-
2001-01-20
(15:26)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-20
(15:26)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-20
(15:31)
Norman Ramsey
unsigned comparisons on int32, int64, nativeint?
-
2001-01-20
(15:32)
Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-20
(15:33)
Norman Ramsey
more on nativeint interface
-
2001-01-20
(15:34)
Zeno
Location of the solutions to exercises in 'The Functional Approach to Programming'?
-
2001-01-20
(15:36)
Don Syme
CamlIDL users & Visual Studio Integration
-
2001-01-20
(15:40)
Vincent Poirriez
CPLEX/OCAML
-
2001-01-21
(21:20)
Brian Rogoff
Re: R: A manual...
-
2001-01-21
(21:18)
Markus Mottl
Re: [off-topic] Survey or book on programming language structures
-
2001-01-21
(21:21)
Xavier Leroy
Re: unsigned comparisons on int32, int64, nativeint?
-
2001-01-21
(21:23)
Xavier Leroy
Re: more on nativeint interface
-
2001-01-21
(21:25)
Alain Frisch
Implicit constraints in type declaration
-
2001-01-21
(21:31)
Pierre Weis
Re: Implicit constraints in type declaration
-
2001-01-22
(21:55)
Mattias Waldau
RE: R: A manual...
-
2001-01-22
(21:55)
SURLOG S.A.
Offre de stage
-
2001-01-22
(21:56)
David Mentre
Re: [off-topic] Survey or book on programming language structures
-
2001-01-22
(21:58)
Olivier Andrieu
Floating-point classification
-
2001-01-22
(21:59)
Markus Mottl
Re: [off-topic] Survey or book on programming language structures
-
2001-01-22
(22:00)
jeanmarc.eber@l...
-custom under win32
-
2001-01-22
(22:05)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-22
(22:05)
Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-22
(22:06)
Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-23
(21:52)
Paul A. Steckler
RE: R: A manual...
-
2001-01-23
(21:57)
Xavier Leroy
Re: GC question
-
2001-01-23
(21:58)
Xavier Leroy
Re: [off-topic] Survey or book on programming language structures
-
2001-01-23
(21:59)
Xavier Leroy
Re: -custom under win32
-
2001-01-23
(22:01)
Lionel Fourquaux
RE: -custom under win32
-
2001-01-24
(17:13)
John Max Skaller
Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
-
2001-01-25
(08:04)
Lionel Fourquaux
RE: -custom under win32
-
2001-01-25
(08:07)
Markus Mottl
Announcement: LACAML
-
2001-01-25
(08:09)
Alex Baretta
Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-25
(08:10)
Alex Baretta
Lex and yacc
-
2001-01-26
(20:58)
goldi@i...
** docteur camelia **
-
2001-01-26
(21:02)
Markus Mottl
Re: Lex and yacc
-
2001-01-26
(21:03)
wester@i...
Floating point array computations
-
2001-01-26
(21:04)
Jan Skibinski
Re: Announcement: LACAML
-
2001-01-26
(21:05)
Laure Danthony
writing in file (byte after byte)
-
2001-01-26
(21:06)
Markus Mottl
Re: Announcement: LACAML
-
2001-01-26
(21:09)
Jan Skibinski
Re: Announcement: LACAML
-
2001-01-26
(21:10)
Xavier Leroy
Re: Floating-point classification
-
2001-01-26
(21:11)
wester@i...
LablTk
-
2001-01-26
(21:12)
Markus Mottl
Re: Announcement: LACAML
-
2001-01-26
(21:29)
Pierre Weis
Re: ** docteur camelia **
-
2001-01-26
(21:30)
Michel Mauny
Consortium Caml
-
2001-01-31
(10:54)
Fabrice Le Fessant
Re: R: Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-31
(10:53)
Alex Baretta
R: Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-31
(10:52)
Xavier Leroy
Re: writing in file (byte after byte)
-
2001-01-31
(10:54)
John Max Skaller
Re: Consortium Caml
-
2001-01-31
(10:58)
Sylvain Kerjean
classes mutually recursive
-
2001-01-31
(10:59)
Jacques Garrigue
Re: LablTk
-
2001-01-31
(11:01)
s. n. wight
Problem compiling xpath/tests
-
2001-01-31
(11:33)
Vitaly Lugovsky
JIT compilation
-
2001-01-31
(16:28)
Alex Baretta
R: Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-31
(16:28)
Vitaly Lugovsky
Re: Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-31
(16:29)
Stephan Houben
list dead?
-
2001-01-31
(16:34)
Mattias Waldau
Print arbitrary value
-
2001-01-31
(16:34)
Fabrice Le Fessant
Re: Ocaml VM and bytecode
-
2001-01-31
(16:47)
Brian Rogoff
Re: classes mutually recursive