Browse thread
[Caml-list] Typing of default arguments
- Patrick M Doane
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Patrick M Doane <patrick@w...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Typing of default arguments |
I am having difficulty understanding the typing rules for default
arguments. Here are some test cases:
(* No default arguments: all of these work *)
let f ~g x = g x
let a = f (fun x -> x) ()
let b = f (fun x -> (x,x)) ()
let c = f ~g:(fun x -> x) ()
let d = f ~g:(fun x -> (x,x)) ()
(* Default argument: last one fails to type-check *)
let f' ?(g = (fun x -> x)) x = g x
let a' = f' (fun x -> x) ()
let b' = f' (fun x -> (x,x)) ()
let c' = f' ~g:(fun x -> x) ()
let d' = f' ~g:(fun x -> (x,x)) ()
If I remove the offending case at the end, I notice that the difference
between f and f' is:
val f : g:('a -> 'b) -> 'a -> 'b
val f' : ?g:('a -> 'a) -> 'a -> 'a
So why does the definition for b' typecheck properly? The type of the
first argument is not 'a -> 'a but rather 'a -> 'a * 'a.
It's unfortunate that supplying a default argument restricts the
polymorphism and reuse of the function. I would like someway to provide
the default without losing that polymorphic capability. I think this
example shows that is should at least be legal to do (from the declaration
of b').
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Patrick Doane
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr