Browse thread
OCaml's long range graphical direction?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <sacerdot@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: OCaml's long range graphical direction? |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:55 +0100, Sven wrote:
> Who is using lablgtk and who is still using mlgtk ?
Project HELM in Bologna was using mlgtk and then moved to lablgtk.
The reasons are:
1. lablgtk is a complete binding, while mlgtk is (was?) not and we
had to add some missing parts
2. the OO layer of lablgtk is a bit disappointing at the beginning,
but after a while it appears to be more high-level and so
better to use
3. the two binding are equally undocumented
This said, I still miss of mlgtk
1. the easy layer for very rapid prototyping
2. writing a new binding was easier
Cheers,
C.S.C.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
Graduate Computer Science Student at University of Bologna
Now at INRIA (Sophia-Antipolis, France)
E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it
http://caristudenti.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot
----------------------------------------------------------------