On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:47:51AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:55 +0100, Sven wrote:
> > Who is using lablgtk and who is still using mlgtk ?
> 
>  Project HELM in Bologna was using mlgtk and then moved to lablgtk.
>  The reasons are:
> 
>   1. lablgtk is a complete binding, while mlgtk is (was?) not and we
>      had to add some missing parts

Due to lack of time ...

and also some people wrote bindings but never contributed them back to us
:(((

>   2. the OO layer of lablgtk is a bit disappointing at the beginning,
>      but after a while it appears to be more high-level and so
>      better to use
>   3. the two binding are equally undocumented
> 
>  This said, I still miss of mlgtk
> 
>   1. the easy layer for very rapid prototyping

Well, i think it could easily be ported, it is not a huge file after all.

>   2. writing a new binding was easier

This comes from 2. before.

Friendly,

Sven Luther