Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] (fwd) Re: Academia isn't interested...
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-03-20 (17:20)
From: Markus Mottl <mottl@m...>
Subject: [Caml-list] (fwd) Re: Academia isn't interested...
-- forwarded message --
From: (Mark Carroll)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Academia isn't interested...
Organization: none
Lines: 19
Sender: mark@niagara.nonet
Message-ID: <99828g$3de$1@niagara.nonet>
References: <> <3ab73b76$> <> <997v7r$k71$>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:59:05 GMT
X-Trace: 985107545 (Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:59:05 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:59:05 EST
Xref: comp.lang.functional:26425

In article <997v7r$k71$>,
Markus Mottl  <> wrote:
>Furthermore, if you have Cygwin you can make full use of the native code
>compiler under Windows. Even the whole Unix-library is portable then! So

You may want to update,
then, given the "A Microsoft Windows ... port ... is
distributed. ... the native-code compiler needs the Microsoft MASM
assembler and Visual C++ compiler."

This is one of the reasons I hadn't gone with OCaml to date. Some
Haskell and ML things seem quite close to where they have to be before
I'll think about using them commercially; I just wish I could choose
the best from each different compiler and union these things
together. (-:

-- Mark
-- end of forwarded message --

Markus Mottl,,
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: