Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] lablgtk polymorphic variants question
- Ruchira Datta
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ruchira Datta <datta@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] lablgtk polymorphic variants question |
Sven LUTHER wrote: >On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:13:50PM -0800, Ruchira Datta wrote: >> I tried to compile lablgtkmathview but ran into an error. I would guess >> that it probably compiled under OCaml 3.00 but doesn't for me since I have >> 3.01. I have lablgtk 1.2.0. (Everything is from Sven Luther's Debian >> packages, except lablgtkmathview and mlminidom which don't seem to be >> packaged yet.) The error: >Yes, there are packages of it, Stefano Zacchiroli did them, and i uploaded >them for him, since i am sponsoring him, and he is not yet a debian >maintainer. Please contact him at : zack@cs.unibo.it. You uploaded them where? I searched unstable and didn't find them. I even looked in Incoming. I had already installed libgtkmathview0, libgtkmathview-bin, libgtkmathview-dev, libminidom0, and libminidom-dev, if you were referring to any of those. The two I am referring to are the OCaml bindings. If the versions I downloaded from Luca Padovani's site (namely mlminidom-0.0.1 and lablgtkmathview-0.2.2) had been packaged, they would have had dependencies on ocaml(>=3.00), and what I am finding is that lablgtkmathview would also have had another dependency on ocaml(<=3.00). But I will contact Stefano Zacchiroli as you suggest. Ruchira Datta datta@math.berkeley.edu ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr