Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | guttman@m... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell) |
Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com> writes:
> >
> > The main problem is that the Tutorial and Reference are weak.
> > If the Ocaml Consortium gets off the ground, this ought to be one
> > of its first tasks (i.e., hire a tech writer, not a programmer!)
>
> Can one of the translators comment on the status of the O'Reilly book
> translation? Once that's available people can modify it as the language
> changes.
>
Well, more than half of the chapters have been checked in in English.
All the remaining chapters have volunteers working on them.
Of course, there will still be a lot of work to do to revise them and
edit them for consistency.
It's a big job, translating a book. And this book is over 700 pages.
But when it's done, it should make an important difference in making
OCaml easier to learn for English speakers.
Joshua
--
Joshua D. Guttman <guttman@mitre.org>
MITRE, Mail Stop S119
202 Burlington Rd. Tel: +1 781 271 2654
Bedford, MA 01730-1420 USA Fax: +1 781 271 3816
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr