Browse thread
[Caml-list] Re: javacaml
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- Sven LUTHER
-
Xavier Leroy
- Chris Hecker
- Gerd Stolpmann
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-06 (19:10) |
From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: javacaml |
>I agree with your conclusions, however you're perhaps slightly too >harsh with MLj: for developing applet-sized programs, for instance, >the limitations of MLj (whole-program compilation, size limitations) >are acceptable. I agree with this. I'd be happy with MLj-level functionality for what I want to do. I wonder how hard it would be to use their work for ocaml. Is this something that would be good to handle at the C-- level, or are there no types down there so it wouldn't work since the JVM wants types? I'm not very familiar with C--...are people using it? It seems like the asmcomp files do something with it, but they don't emit intermediate code as much as intermediate datastructures. Do they match C-- and it's not emited as a file to save time? > At any rate, I believe Web applets are a totally uninteresting >application area. Most Web designers seem happy with JavaScript >hacks, and in many years of intense Web surfing, I came across an >interesting Java applet only once (Certicom's excellent tutorial on >elliptic curve cryptography). Really? I find tons of cool applets that are used for teaching small concepts, everything from sorting to solving PDEs. I think of them as interactive illustrations in papers, not as full fledged applications. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr