Browse thread
[Caml-list] Interfacing C++ and Ocaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-09 (15:19) |
From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@o...> |
Subject: | Re: Overloading again (Was Re: [Caml-list] Interfacing C++ and Ocaml) |
Brian Rogoff wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Alliot wrote: > > Fergus Henderson wrote: > > > My opinion with regard to overloading is that what is really > > > problematic about overloading in C++ is the *combination* of > > > overloading and implicit conversions. > > I agree with Fergus on this. This is not just a matter of opinion but mathematics. There is a paper dealing with the interaction of generics and implicit conversions which details conditions under which both can coexist without ambiguity: Using Category Theory to Design Implicit Conversions and Generic Operators, John C Reynolds, Theoretical Aspects of Object-Oriented Programming, Gunter and Mitchell, MIT Press ISBN 0-262-07155-X -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr