Browse thread
[Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-09 (15:21) |
From: | Christian RINDERKNECHT <rinderkn@h...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match? |
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 09:45:52PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote: > > I would suggest [...] as we already did for functions, > we should prefer the curried syntax for constructors. I am not used to support a new feature by a posting, but this one seems to me an important improvement: it is elegant and conservative, and will be used all the time, without misunderstanding... Regards, -- Christian ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Christian Rinderknecht Phone +33 (0)1 60 76 44 43 Institut National des Télécommunications Fax +33 (0)1 60 76 47 11 Département Logiciels Réseaux (LOR) WWW 9, Rue Charles Fourier, F-91011 Évry Cedex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr