>  > 1. Multiple arguments.  Fine for the calculus, but in any language with
>>  tuples or records we can just write f(x,y), like everybody else.
>
>This is as much of a hack as currying. Why to pack arguments in a tuple
>when you could simply use currying?

Multiple return values.  Unless you want to make continuations 
explicit (and that doesn't seem to be what Caml folk want), arguments 
in a tuple merely mirror results in a tuple.

Curried continuations ... yummm.

-- Bruce
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr