Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels
-
Yaron M. Minsky
-
Jacques Garrigue
-
Judicael Courant
- Markus Mottl
- kahl@h...
- Chris Hecker
-
Judicael Courant
-
Jacques Garrigue
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling |
May I ask a question? What is exactly the problem of having just one mode: labels being optional *and* commutation mode? What is the problem, exactly? 1. if there are no labels, then the order is the order 2. if there are labels, then the parameters are indicated by the labels Where is the problem? Could you give us examples? -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr