Browse thread
[Caml-list] petty complaints
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David McClain <dmcclain1@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] petty complaints |
> Haskell allows to
> use any identifier as a binary operator when it is placed in
> backquotes: x `plus` y. These operators are often more readable than
> the classic infix operator symbols. These terms have no associativity
> and a low precedence, thus forcing to use parentheses. An
> implementation would only affect the lexer and should not be too hard.
> Would other people like this feature, too?
Yes, indeed! I have implemented this in my NML which is a very simple
language in comparison to OCaml, but it borrowed the OCaml Lex and Yacc as
starting points. It was very easy to implement this feature and I tend to
use it most often with integer divide, modulo, and the bit twiddling
primitives, as in
let x = y `mod` z in ...
I also have a syntax for list and vector comprehensions, a la Haskell. Very
convenient for terse programming, e.g.,
let x = [(a,b) |: a <- [1 .. 100], b <- 100 - a] in ...
- DM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Lindig" <lindig@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: "Caml Mailing List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] petty complaints
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote:
> > Another unrelated trifling question concerns the syntax of numerical
> > literals.
>
> Now that the spring cleaning for OCaml's syntax (floats, labels,
> constructors) is in full swing, here is my wish: Haskell allows to
> use any identifier as a binary operator when it is placed in
> backquotes: x `plus` y. These operators are often more readable than
> the classic infix operator symbols. These terms have no associativity
> and a low precedence, thus forcing to use parentheses. An
> implementation would only affect the lexer and should not be too hard.
> Would other people like this feature, too?
>
> -- Christian
>
> --
> Christian Lindig Harvard University - DEAS
> lindig@eecs.harvard.edu 33 Oxford St, MD 242, Cambridge MA 02138
> phone: +1 (617) 496-7157 http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~lindig/
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr