[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-26 (08:24) |
From: | Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] two unrelated questions |
Patrick M Doane wrote: > > We can even get labelled breaks like Java: > > exception Break of string > try > List.iter (fun ... -> > try > List.iter (fun ... -> > if .. then raise (Break "inner") > else raise (Break "outer") > ) list1 > with Break "inner" -> () > ) list2 > with Break "outer" -> () Is there any reason that declaring two different exceptions BreakInner and BreakOuter does not suffice? - Andreas -- Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de "Computer games don't affect kids. If Pac Man affected us as kids, we would all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills, and listening to repetitive music." ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr