Browse thread
[Caml-list] operators: compose and Haskell's $ operator
-
Charles Martin
- Brian Rogoff
- Charles Martin
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-26 (01:20) |
From: | Charles Martin <charles@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] operators: compose and Haskell's $ operator |
At 05:57 PM 4/25/01 -0700, you wrote: >On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Charles Martin wrote: >>equivalent for the $ operator eludes me, as it needs to be right >>associative and of low precedence. > ># let ( <-> ) f x = f x;; >val ( <-> ) : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a -> 'b = <fun> Unfortunately, this is left-associative: # (+) 3 <-> ( * ) 2 <-> 4;; Characters 0-5: This expression has type int -> int but is here used with type (int -> int) -> 'a ...and higher in precedence than logical operators: # not <-> true && false;; - : bool = false The expression table (http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/htmlman/manual014.html) does not have an ellipsis after the "<-" entry, so I assume that "<->" gets lumped into the "other infix symbols" category, which is left associative (and higher precedence than the logical operators). ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr