On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:50:49PM +0200, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> Of course, it is still possible to use the current JavaCaml implementation, and
> to extend it. However, I must warn you. "Some graphics, mouse/keyboard,
> simple UI, networking" would require more performance than this emulation can
> give you, even with execellent JIT compilers and fast CPUs. It's only several
> thousand bytecode instructions per second.

Also javacaml don't work with the current ocaml, am i right in thinking this
Gerd ?

I suppose not too much work would be needed to solve this, as you only need to
add the primitives that were added to the standard lib between ocaml 2.0x and
3.01.

What are the other java alternatives for doing interactive web sites out of
ocaml bytecode, beside the cgi way that is.

Also, still no luck to ever see the ocaml plugin to netscape ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr