Browse thread
[Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-08 (20:35) |
From: | Charles Martin <charles@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match? |
> > Sounds good to me. Now, for consistency, shouldn't you do the same > > for function arguments? ;-) > >I would suggest the other way round: as we already did for functions, >we should prefer the curried syntax for constructors. Yes, yes, yes please! ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr