Hi,

My opinion is that the confusion comes from the syntax. In my revised syntax
by Camlp4, I propose to represent constructors with several parameters with
currification syntax. You can write:

     type t1 = [ Foo of int and int ]    to specify two parameters
     type t2 = [ Bar of (int * int) ]    to specify one parameter, a tuple

And you (must) write:
    Foo 3 5
    Bar (3, 5)

The case:
    Foo 3
answers:
    The constructor Foo expects 2 argument(s),
    but is here applied to 1 argument(s)
which is normal.

Idem for the case:
   match x with [ Foo y -> y ]

To get the couple, you have to write:
   match x with [ Foo y z -> (y, z) ]

This is logical. With this syntax, no possible confusion. You would
even not have asked the question.

It is not a question of semantics, but a question of *syntax*.

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr