Browse thread
[Caml-list] petty complaints
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christian Lindig <lindig@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] petty complaints |
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote: > Another unrelated trifling question concerns the syntax of numerical > literals. Now that the spring cleaning for OCaml's syntax (floats, labels, constructors) is in full swing, here is my wish: Haskell allows to use any identifier as a binary operator when it is placed in backquotes: x `plus` y. These operators are often more readable than the classic infix operator symbols. These terms have no associativity and a low precedence, thus forcing to use parentheses. An implementation would only affect the lexer and should not be too hard. Would other people like this feature, too? -- Christian -- Christian Lindig Harvard University - DEAS lindig@eecs.harvard.edu 33 Oxford St, MD 242, Cambridge MA 02138 phone: +1 (617) 496-7157 http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~lindig/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr