English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] petty complaints
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-04-09 (15:35)
From: Christian Lindig <lindig@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] petty complaints
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote:
>     Another unrelated trifling question concerns the syntax of numerical 
> literals. 

Now that the spring cleaning for OCaml's syntax (floats, labels,
constructors) is in full swing, here is my wish:  Haskell allows to
use any identifier as a binary operator when it is placed in
backquotes:  x `plus` y.  These operators are often more readable than
the classic infix operator symbols.  These terms have no associativity
and a low precedence, thus forcing to use parentheses.  An
implementation would only affect the lexer and should not be too hard. 
Would other people like this feature, too?

-- Christian

Christian Lindig          Harvard University - DEAS
lindig@eecs.harvard.edu   33 Oxford St, MD 242, Cambridge MA 02138
phone: +1 (617) 496-7157  http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~lindig/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr