Browse thread
[Caml-list] petty complaints
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | qrczak@k... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] petty complaints |
Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:29:46 +0200 (MET DST), Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr> pisze:
> On the other hand, the new infix identifiers would start by a lower
> case letter (as usual value identifiers).
Well, in Haskell you may infixize constructor names too. Including patterns
and their definition. The name can be even qualified with a module (inside
backquotes), but nothing more complex is allowed there, and it doesn't apply
to types.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak@knm.org.pl http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr