Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels
-
Yaron M. Minsky
-
Jacques Garrigue
-
Judicael Courant
- Markus Mottl
- kahl@h...
- Chris Hecker
-
Judicael Courant
-
Jacques Garrigue
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-11 (13:56) |
From: | Lionnel Maugis <maugis@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling |
I'd like to stress a simple user's viewpoint regarding the evolutions of Ocaml, namely to try to Keep It Simple, Sirs. Please. We've been using ocaml since 1995 since it enables us to achieves a fairly good balance of clean and efficient code: modular, reusable, type checked. (Btw, many thanks to the excellent job done by Xavier and his team !) With all its new features, we would love to see the learning curve and verbosity be kept at a reasonable level. Although Ocaml includes advanced features such as lazy structures, classes, labels, stream parsers, parameterized modules, to name a few, these are not of mandatory use when learning the core language. Please to not repell future Ocaml users with mandatory features that may be difficult to grasp to newcomers. (We do not all work at Inria) As a research language, Ocaml will evolve, but thank you again for taking into account users with various skill levels, and for resisting to the need to add things. - Lionnel Maugis Division Routes, Flux et Modélisation Centre d'Etudes de la Navigation Aérienne 1 rue champagne, Athis-Mons ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr