Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels
-
Yaron M. Minsky
-
Jacques Garrigue
-
Judicael Courant
- Markus Mottl
- kahl@h...
- Chris Hecker
-
Judicael Courant
-
Jacques Garrigue
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-12 (18:31) |
From: | David Fox <dsfox@c...> |
Subject: | [Caml-list] Seg fault with -custom and 2049 lets... |
If I create a program with 2049 simple functions: let f1 () = () let f2 () = () ... let f2049 () = () (You can build this using yes "" | cat -n | head -2049 | sed 's/^[^0-9]*\([0-9]*\)[^0-9]*$/let f\1 () = ()/' > y.ml) I get a seg fault if I compile it with the -custom flag and use a debugging version of malloc: % ocamlc -custom y.ml -ccopt -lefence % ./a.out Electric Fence 2.2.0 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> Segmentation fault (core dumped) % or if I link using the debugging library libcamlrund.a: % ./a.out ### O'Caml runtime: debug mode ### Initial minor heap size: 128k bytes Initial major heap size: 248k bytes Initial space overhead: 42% Initial max overhead: 1000000% Initial heap increment: 248k bytes Initial stack limit: 1024k bytes file interp.c; line 255 ### Assertion failed: sp >= stack_low If I use the regular (non-debugging) library I don't get the seg fault immediately, but in a real life situation things get ugly pretty quickly. -david ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr