[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Anton Moscal <msk@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] two unrelated questions |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, John Max Skaller wrote:
> Unfortunately:
>
> let f x =
> exception Break
> try ... raise Break ...
> with Break -> ()
> ;;
>
> is in error, because exception declarations must be at the top
> level. This prevents desired localisation: this feature is not
> as good as a labelled break for this purpose.
For this problem workaround exists:
let f x =
let module M = struct
exception Break
let v = try ... raise Break ... with Break ->...
end
in M.v
I made syntax extension for camlp4 and now can write something like this:
let f x = let exception Break in ...
Regards,
Anton
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr