[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] two unrelated questions |
Mark Seaborn wrote: > Another way of doing it is to CPS-convert the fold function to get > something like: > > let rec foldc kons knil l = match l with > | [] -> knil > | x::xs -> kons x knil (fun rest -> foldc kons rest xs) > This is more powerful than fold, but also harder to understand, You're not kidding, on both counts :-) It's also 'ugly', because it only works for lists, but this is only because you hard coded the destructor. Passing it as an argument: let rec foldc remove kons knil l = match remove l with | (_,None) -> knil | (xs,Some x) -> kons x knil (fun rest -> foldc remove kons rest xs) let foldc_list = foldc (fun l -> match l with | [] -> l,None | x::xs -> xs,Some x) It's a pity there is no such destructor for a Hashtbl. [All C++ STL data structures have read iterators, which amount to destructors] -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr