Browse thread
[Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-04-07 (06:44) |
From: | Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match? |
Hi, On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:42:38PM -0400, Patrick M Doane wrote: > What are the current thoughts about adopting the revised syntax as the > "standard one"? How many programmers use that syntax? Discussions about syntax generally degenerate into quarrels because it is often a question of taste and find a consensus is extremely hard. Adopting it as "standard one" is then not possible. And there is too much code written in OCaml by all users. I wrote this "revised" syntax but I don't think that many people use it. I have no idea of the number, but probably very few. Except me, I just know two persons, one of them already not agreeing one of my choices. I agree to improve this syntax, to change things (I mean in the Camlp4 distribution), but only if there are more than 3 persons interested. Well, everybody can make his own syntax, e.g. starting from the file treating the normal syntax (etc/pa_o.ml) or the file of the revised syntax (meta/pa_r.ml). This revised syntax, even dating from several years, is just an experiment. I would have liked that people experiment other possible syntaxes, but it seems that it is not a subject interesting many people. Less than genealogy, in any case... -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr