Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Future of labels
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@o...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Indexed and optional arguments (was Future of labels)
Jacques Garrigue wrote:

> > In this way, we have only strict commuting label mode, but we can still
> > use positional notation via sugar.
 
> This is already the case :-)

	If that is so, then provided libraries contain no labels,
all existing 'classic' Ocaml code will continue to work in
strict commuting label mode.

	In particular, no 'classic' ocaml user will notice
any difference: only 'classic mode' users who played with
some labels (and probably expected to get burned by 
further changes anyhow). Is that right?

-- 
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr