Browse thread
[Caml-list] CDK binary release
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <mottl@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] CDK binary release |
On Thu, 10 May 2001, John Max Skaller wrote: > But the CDK generates documentation is a way that clearly > defines such a 'standard'. Right, 'a' standard, not 'the' standard... ;) > So what's needed is a description of this for people preparing packages > for inclusion in CDK. But what if I want to e.g. convert my documentation to PostScript, too? I want to have 'a' standard that covers most important aspects and is supported by a significant group of users (when I was younger I never managed to abide by my mum's rule: Don't say "I want ..."! You cannot have everything - you have to learn how to do without!" ;) Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr