[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Tyng-Ruey Chuang <trc@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Weird types |
Jean-Christophe FILLIATRE wrote:
> Actually, there is a type-able way of writing this function, which
> consists in duplicating it into two functions, like this:
>
> ======================================================================
> type ('a,'b,'c) t =
> | A of 'a * 'b * 'c
> | B of ('b, 'a, 'c) t
>
> let rec gamma = function
> | A _ -> 0
> | B x -> 1 + gamma' x
>
> and gamma' = function
> | A _ -> 0
> | B x -> 1 + gamma x
> ======================================================================
>
> which gives the expected types:
>
> ======================================================================
> val gamma : ('a, 'b, 'c) t -> int = <fun>
> val gamma' : ('a, 'b, 'c) t -> int = <fun>
> ======================================================================
Interesting! But then size of the duplicated code grows exponentially.
For example, for a 3-ary type constructor sigma
type ('a, 'b, 'c) sigma =
I of 'a * 'b * 'c
| T of ('b, 'a, 'c) sigma
| P of ('b, 'c, 'a) sigma
one need to define the 6 equivalent "length" functions gamma_xxx,
where xxx ranges from {abc, acb, bac, bca, cab, cba}, by
let rec gamma_abc s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_bac x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_bca x
and gamma_acb s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_cab x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_cba x
and gamma_bac s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_abc x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_acb x
and gamma_bca s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_cba x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_cab x
and gamma_cab s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_acb x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_abc x
and gamma_cba s =
match s with
I _ -> 0
| T x -> 1 + gamma_bca x
| P x -> 1 + gamma_bac x
For the original definition of 7-ary sigma
type ('a,'b,'c,'d,'e,'f,'g) sigma =
I of 'a * 'b * 'c * 'd * 'e * 'f * 'g
| T of ('b,'a,'c,'d,'e,'f,'g) sigma
| P of ('b,'c,'d,'e,'f,'g,'a) sigma
one probably will need 7! = 5040 equivalent "length" functions
that are recursively defined among themselves!
I guess language-supported polymorphic recursions will help here.
However, I believe the general problem of typing polymorphic recursive
functions had been shown to be undecidable.
Tyng-Ruey Chuang
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr