Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity
William Chesters wrote:

> The really big cultural shift is to think in recursive not iterative
> terms.  

	I don't agree. It does take time to learn to use
recursion and inductive data types effectively, but they
exist in C++ too.

	The really BIG culture shift, in my opinion,
is something much simpler: syntax. I think humans,
particularly experts, can read programs by high speed
unconscious pattern matching that is _highly_ sensitive
to syntactic form, and even lexicology. 

	Just try reading C++ or Ocaml which is not sensibly 
indented to see what I mean, or switch the colours around
in your favourite colourizing editor to get immediate
vertigo and loss of comprehension.

	Or have a look at the arguments about which
operator to use for some feature. Syntax is more
important than most of us think.

-- 
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr