Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity |
William Chesters wrote: > The really big cultural shift is to think in recursive not iterative > terms. I don't agree. It does take time to learn to use recursion and inductive data types effectively, but they exist in C++ too. The really BIG culture shift, in my opinion, is something much simpler: syntax. I think humans, particularly experts, can read programs by high speed unconscious pattern matching that is _highly_ sensitive to syntactic form, and even lexicology. Just try reading C++ or Ocaml which is not sensibly indented to see what I mean, or switch the colours around in your favourite colourizing editor to get immediate vertigo and loss of comprehension. Or have a look at the arguments about which operator to use for some feature. Syntax is more important than most of us think. -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr