Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] pretty printers and format and matrices
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Hendrik Tews <tews@t...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] pretty printers and format and matrices

Pierre Weis writes:
   Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:37:44 +0200 (MET DST)
   Subject: Re: [Caml-list] pretty printers and format and matrices
   However, I should admit that you will still be facing another
   stupid limit (no more than 2^30 words in a big integer, which means
   approximately 9 * 2 ^ 30 decimal digits on a little machine, once more
   far far away from infinity). 

OK, I see you are in sarcastic mood ... I am actually negotiating
with John Skaller the foundation of the "Got bitten by Pierre
Club", anybody else who wants to participate?

   Sorry for this unsatisfactory answer, due to stupid limitations in the
Then I would like to suggest to add a new feature to a future
version of the format module: "do_never_print_ellipsis". Perhaps 
(set_max_boxes -1) could be interpreded this way.

Problems like "The most interesting problem repaired by the
Judges was that one entry nested Objective Caml's Format boxes
too deeply ....", quoted from [1], would then belong to the past.


   set_max_boxes max_int;;
   On a regular machine this allows to simultaneously open no more than
   4611686018427387903 boxes, which could be large enough to pretty print

I have 

# max_int;;
- : int = 1073741823

so what's a regular machine??

Thanks anyway for the unsatisfactory answer,


[1] The 1999 ICFP Programming Contest. ACM SIGPLAN Notices,
35(3), pp. 73-83, March 2000. Available at
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: