Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Evaluation Order
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Evaluation Order
Frederick Smith wrote:
> I do not believe a simple effect annotation on function types, as suggested, would
> suffice.  Although we may like to think of OCaml programs as effect free, they are
> replete with effects: 1) I/O, 2) exceptions, and 3) non-termination.  

	Arghh. You're quite right. Even if we forget about
non-termination, the dynamic nature of exception handling
makes it very hard to make static typing rules which account
for them.

John (Max) Skaller,
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper
download Interscript
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: