Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Sven LUTHER <luther@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:25:06AM -0600, Chris Curtis wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:51:54 -0700
> wrote:
> > Any chance of changing to or adding GPL?
> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't. I agree that readline would be
> cool, but in return you give up the ability to use the
> toplevel in any non-GPL environment.  GPL is a very big
> hammer; let's not go swinging it hastily.

Unless you dual license like TrollTech finally did for Qt.

This said, i am not asking for a GPLed version of ocaml, please don't take it

That said, i have just checked, the toplevel directory is under the QPL, i
suppose it links also to all the LGPLed part of the ocaml runtime, altough a
quick glance at the corresponding makefile don't show that clearly.

Would a LGPLed version of the toplevel files solve this, i don't know, i just
aksed the debian legal mailing list about this, will forward what they tell me
about it.


Sven Luther
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: