Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Fox <dsf@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity |
Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com> writes: > not disasterous. We might get more libraries and whatnot with more > people, but there would be downsides to more popularity as well. I am going to strongly disagree with this statement. I think that more libraries are extremely important, and I also think that the fact that many good things are unpopular doesn't imply that all popular things are bad, or that something becomes worse when it becomes popular. > Three other ways to come into contact with a new language are of > more questionable value (again, in my opinion, of course): 3) being > forced to learn it at school before you're ready, 4) being told by > an employer you have to learn it, and 5) looking on monster.com and > deciding you need to learn whatever ranks highest in help wanted > ads. I also believe that the "right thing for the wrong reason" beats the heck out of the wrong thing in most cases. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr