Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefan Monnier <monnier+lists.caml/news/@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions |
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com> writes: > regardless. Coming back to the subject of this thread, in an ideal world, > there wouldn't be a need to distinguish between Bigarray and Array, you'd > just use polymorphic arrays and the compiler would be smart enough to > always get unboxed and tag free element representations. Supposedly Stalin That's also what SML/NJ tries to do. But short of doing whole program analysis and/or profiling feedback, it's difficult to generate as good code as in the Bigarray case. Stefan ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr